Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Chapman's avatar

At the last local body elections in my home district, Ruapehu, a majority of Māori candidates were returning in all the community boards where they stood. In the general council seats where I stood, I was defeated by a Māori general ward candidate, the only Māori candidate to contest a general seat. Based on the last election, I'd say we don't need Māori wards to ensure Māori have a seat at the table. In Ruapehu, at least, if Māori stand, they do get elected.

Basil Brush's avatar

Imagine if it was non-Maori insisting on special non-Maori wards - wards dedicated principally to advancing parochial non-Māori interests. Wouldn’t fly, would it. Yet, in a representation system that tolerates electoral wards based on racial exceptionalism, such a proposition would be perfectly acceptable.

Other ethnicities, minority or otherwise, are denied this privilege. Why?

Racially-based electoral wards are instruments of Labour/TPM’s ‘new’ democracy. They consolidate the principle that Māori self-determination means sovereign authority over all things New Zealand, a contestable and contested doctrine germinated in Treaty revisionism since the 1970s. By definition, the doctrine subordinates the democratic principle of governance _in the public interest_ to the self-referring rights of Māori. Democracy as we know it becomes a supplicant.

23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?