Another great read Grant. Until we see the Electoral Review recommendation of 3.5% party vote vs 5% we'll be stuck with the Green/Yellow (or is it pink now?) propping up the purple reign. Seymour's 'wasting public money' narrative wouldn't stand up very well against the cost of another election via hung Parliament, nor I suspect would his vote numbers
Fair point... any party that destabilises government would likely be punished by voters. Seymour's confidence-only proposition could force National to seek support from other parties, who'll have their own conditions attached, and that would create uncertainty for everyone.
I have yet to meet in my travels anyone ,Red or Blue, who will be voting National or ACT,-Luxon is seen as inept, and a common point is 'don't rock the Economic boat'.
LuxonWillis and Seymour are scaring more Kiwi's than reassuring them-and you have ignored their main playing card-Race-which Boomers prick their ears up at, every time.
Another great read Grant. Until we see the Electoral Review recommendation of 3.5% party vote vs 5% we'll be stuck with the Green/Yellow (or is it pink now?) propping up the purple reign. Seymour's 'wasting public money' narrative wouldn't stand up very well against the cost of another election via hung Parliament, nor I suspect would his vote numbers
Fair point... any party that destabilises government would likely be punished by voters. Seymour's confidence-only proposition could force National to seek support from other parties, who'll have their own conditions attached, and that would create uncertainty for everyone.
I have yet to meet in my travels anyone ,Red or Blue, who will be voting National or ACT,-Luxon is seen as inept, and a common point is 'don't rock the Economic boat'.
LuxonWillis and Seymour are scaring more Kiwi's than reassuring them-and you have ignored their main playing card-Race-which Boomers prick their ears up at, every time.